The Received lines are a chain.  You start at the top and that is the most *RECENT* place the e-mail came from.  The *BOTTOM* is where the e-mail started from ---> With one caveat.  The spammer can add Received: lines onto the bottom making it look like it really originated from somewhere else, but as you get experience you will figure out what "looks wrong" and ignore those lines.

> Received: from smtp.your.isp ([192.168.16.1]) by smtp.your.isp with

> Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);

> Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:25:06 +0100

Received by your ISP (Internet Service Provider).

> Received: from adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net ([141.154.84.234]) by

> smtp.your.isp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);

> Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:25:00 +0100

Received from 141.154.84.234 by your ISP.  Double check that 141.154.84.234 actually is adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net at Sam Spade:

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=141.154.84.234

SamSpade says:

141.154.84.234 has valid reverse DNS of adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net

So that is correct.  Please note that 141.154.84.234 is a DSL connection.  I would almost bet that the e-mail originated from 141.154.84.234 and that the next line was put into the e-mail to confuse the issue.

> Received: from sq.38hhzc6.org ([65.49.45.211])

> by adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net with ESMTP id 31E493C63CF

> for <garfield_@netcabo.pt>; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:17:34 -0400

Again we check that 65.49.45.211 is sq.38hhzc6.org:

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=65.49.45.211

Same Spade says:

65.49.45.211 has valid reverse DNS of CPE0010db25c8b1-CM0f2029968262.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com

Something is not right here.

We look up sq.38hhzc6.org in Sam Spade:

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=sq.38hhzc6.org

Nothing is found.

We look up sq.38hhzc6.org in Google:

http://www.google.com/search?q=sq.38hhzc6.org

Google hasn't heard of it.  Also note that the times for the Received line above is:

Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:17:34 -0400

The Received line above it is:

Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:25:00 +0100

So we correct for the same time zones we get:

Received #1: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:25:06 +0000

Received #2: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:25:00 +0000

Received #3: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:17:34 -0000

So either the third Received line was faked (A very good possibility) or the machines times were all screwed up (less and less a possibility).  I would discard the last line as faked.

Therefore we would send a complaint to whoever owns:

adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net.

We go to Google and search for abuse and ba-dsg.net:

http://www.google.com/search?q=abuse+ba-dsg.net

Don't find much so we go to Sam Spade or Abuse Net and take a look for ba-dsg.net:

http://www.abuse.net/lookup.phtml

Tells us:

abuse@verizon.net

postmaster@ba-dsg.net

Sam Spade tells us:

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=adsl-141-154-84-234.ba-dsg.net

It traces through Verizon so I would send the complaint to abuse@verizon.net.  If it tells me that the person to complain to is not a "major" Internet Provider I take a look at their web page.  If it looks like they address spam issues then I send them the complaint otherwise I let the major Internet Provider handle it.

Everything below this line is easily faked, so you can ignore this part for the most part.

> Message-ID: <u-64i-8se8$q476-5b49-7y@tjb1voib2>

> From: "Molly Baxter" <lvwm86pem@msn.com>

> To: YourEMail@your.provider.com

> Subject: Jenni Lopez exposed nipple pics

> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 03 18:17:34 GMT

> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200

> MIME-Version: 1.0

> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

> boundary="A45.B_.CD.5.EC46"

> X-Priority: 3

> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

> Return-Path: lvwm86pem@msn.com

> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2003 21:25:04.0639 (UTC)

> FILETIME=[33C138F0:01C35C61]

One more note, some of the spammers "name" their computer something that looks real, like "supersoftware.com" or "abcmail.com".

> Received: from fcmail.com ([24.95.52.135]) by mc2-f14.law16.hotmail.com with

> Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);

What is fake is the portion "fcmail.com".  That is what the spammer "named" their computer. Complain to abuse@rr.com.

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=24.95.52.135 gives us

24.95.52.135 has valid reverse DNS of dhcp9552135.columbus.rr.com

Next we reverse check with Sam Spade:

http://samspade.org/t/lookat?a=fcmail.com

The DNS search shows nothing, and traceroute said it doesn't exist.  So the initial Sam Spade lookup is correct.